Monday, May 19, 2008

Faint of Hart

Mike Hart stumbled badly today on his last game in their own turf, and so did the Wolverines to lose the 2007 Big Ten College Football Championship against the Buckeyes, 14-3.

He was a formidable bulldozer last year even against the stellar cast of Troy Smith and company. Aside from his very strong legs that can plow through the defensive line, he has also a competitive heart that can fire up teammates and belittle many bigger men in the football field. Though small in stature by football standards, any opposing team has to be very concerned of his offensive prowess.

This time though, his offense was just plain ugly offensive.

In one play early into the game, he made a good defensive bump to protect their ball against one rushing unidentified Buckeye. The ball was dead already and while this Buckeye was trying to get up from the ground, Hart shoved him down. Once on his feet, he returned the push.

Throughout the game, I have never seen any Buckeye dish out such an extra dirty tackle of any kind although anybody could have done it especially against their injured quarterback, Chad Henne.

Hart was probably desperate and worried with his own injury and so he tried to put up a courageous mask. On the other end, Beanie Wells has been nursing some injury of his own but his warrior spirit is far superior than Hart. Wells shrugged off pain and dazzled the defense with his record-setting 222 rushing yards and two touchdowns in the fierce, long-storied Ohio State-Michigan rivalry. Hart was held to his lowest 44 rushing yards with such a choking defense.

All in all, Wells, Vernon Gholston and the rest of the Buckeyes simply outclassed Hart and the Wolverines. And that refers not only to athletic terms but to every sense of the word.

...
I wrote this article immediately after the Nov 17 (2007) game. Then, I rewrote this piece into a short version for the comments/opinion section of The Lantern, the official student paper of Ohio State University. My piece was published next issue, Nov 19, as shown below.



Pandan cake::



...
[ Pandan Cake ]
:: my oven overtures | tuller house, columbus, oh | 01.08.2008 ::

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Childhood memories

I learned a few years back that childhood memories tell something about our personal psychological profile. Usually, we are described only by temperament (the four famous, classical temperament: sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic) but I agree with some authors that there are other significant factors defining our personality. Aside from temperament, these factors are: childhood memories, birth order and love language. I'll share some more about these but for now, I'll stay with childhood memories.

According to psychologists, memories stay for some significant reason or reasons. Memories may be sad or happy (or somewhere in between) but they are all significant. If past experiences were not that significant, time would eventually erase them. Of course, sometimes, diminished physical and mental abilities tend to wash out even the fondest memories and so we lose the details but we know there must be something very significant when we are moved deeply by some reminders. We may not be able to articulate the recollection but we know if it was something significant.

I was too young to know my age and other details of the circumstances but these are things that I recall of my childhood. To the best of my ability, this is my estimate of the chronological events in my life as a young, (smart, handsome) kid:

1] Builder, helper
Papa (my biological father) was working with a neighbor laborer, Sandy (Domingo Sarmiento), on the roof of our house. Our house was new, under construction but almost finished. I picked a piece of wood and I was giving it to them atop the roof although Sandy was closer the edge of the roof and therefore nearer to me. Well, he wasn't very near because I was just a small kid on the ground and the roof was definitely higher than me. I was looking upwards, extending my hand with the piece of wood. I remember the surprised look from both Sandy and Papa. They were smiling broadly. It was like them saying, “Hey, you're too young and small to help out as a laborer. You're supposed to be playing, not working. Besides, what do we do with that piece of wood?”

Well, I don't really know if they ever said those words. I just associate those statements with this memory.

2] Birthday specials
I remember a birthday was a very special event because I was pampered with these birthday specials: lechon (pinoy-style roast or barbecue pork), cake, birthday gifts (toy, new clothes, shoes). The lechon has always been a vivid image. We were raising several pigs and one of these has to be butchered and cooked for my birthday. The lechon was so big, overwhelmingly big that I felt it was quite a feast every time. It must really be a grand celebration.

Later, we also raised poultry (native, free range chicken, 45-days broilers and layers). Life must be getting hard so my parents would serve chicken (fried chicken and other chicken food variants) instead and spare the pigs. I guess the swine can bring more income than chicken.

In all these birthday food preparation, I remember the primary character behind was Mama Ging. She is the younger sister of my maternal grandmother. While staying with us, she was also running an eatery. She's a very good cook. She's very organized, quite a disciplinarian, excellent in managing finances. She was like a surrogate mother for us while our parents were at work. She enforces strict schedules for sleeping time, siesta, eating, playing, studying.

The other secondary characters (which means their images were not as vivid) were my parents, Pedring (a househelp), my siblings, Tito Nick and some godfathers and godmothers.

By the way, this kind of celebration was also true for all my siblings. The celebration would fade away as we grow older.

3] Brave, vigilant protector
My mother tagged me along one time to a class she was teaching. While she was writing something on the board, one of her students, on the way out of the classroom, passed by her table and quickly took her wallet (leather, cream colored with specks of dark brown flowers) underneath the open desk. I guess no one saw that except me.

I quickly dialed 911 on my iPhone and I also called the FBI. In a snap, hordes of heavily armed helicopters and fighter jets were hovering around the school. Snipers were deployed everywhere. CNN, GMA 7 and ABS CBN reporters were fielding questions to me left and right.

Alright, this is what really happened. I immediately approached Nanay, and frantically tugged her skirt with my tiny hands to alert her about the crime. She then called the security guard. The guard later caught the student hiding at the comfort room at a nearby building.

In that event, I never feared the student. I guess he knew that I saw him but he probably thought I was too young to ever care about reporting theft to anyone.

The event must have happened during weekdays and if I was with my mother during school hours, it is highly probable that I was younger than 5 and not yet going to school. (I entered grade 1 at 5.)

I also remember people praising me for my vigilance. I felt like a superhero of some sort.

4] Birth right
I must be school-age already when I learned about birth right although I think I received some sort of homeschooling lessons from my parents and Mama Ging. This memory is also related with birthday specials (above) to some extent. I had always received a profuse amount of affirmation that I am the rightful successor to the throne of my father. I may be the 4th child but I am the first born male and so I am special. The birth right, which I imagine as some sort of very, very grand privilege, does not go to Ate Joy even if she is the eldest because we were told that, as in biblical accounts, birth right goes to the first born male.

I attended the Inarihan Seventh-Day Adventist Multigrade School where Bible was one regular subject, just like Math or English. I was given some Bible lessons at home and in school about Abel and Cain, Isaac, Jacob and his sons Joseph, Benjamin, Reuben, etc. and the concept of birth right among these characters.

I don't remember any violent reaction from my siblings about me getting the birth right. It might be interesting to know how each of them felt about it especially Ate Joy and Fr Rico, my youngest brother.

5] Positive affirmation. In my earliest days and years as a young student, I had been showered with great amount of words of affirmation that I am intelligent. Later on, I observed that other people, including first time acquaintances and strangers would naturally compliment me or perceive me as someone very intelligent even without me doing anything or presenting any proof.

Of course, I enjoyed the attention and I didn't bother to check if their feedback was accurate enough.

There is something macho to intelligence even without you wearing designer clothes, working out at the gym or doing some skin and hair care regimen.

Kuya Dennis (a chemical engineer from UP Diliman) captured it succinctly when he said: “I never knew I'm handsome (to girls) until I became 7th placer.”

And so, I may not have the stature of Brad Pitt and Piolo Pascual but you know how I felt when I landed 5th place (agricultural engineering) some years later. Of course, movie offers didn't come and I would wake up to reality soon enough.


...to be continued.


next:

Family Sundays, concept of sin and God, attention and warmth, tatay, concept of responsibility, meritocracy, age of turbulence, life foot prints

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Mac::





...
[Mac]
:: Tuller house, Columbus, OH :: 04.06.08::

Canon-ization

To ease my agony over which DSLR to buy, I created some criteria. These are price, image quality, speed, weatherproofing, image stabilization, cost of accessories and low light sensitivity.
These parameters have finally allowed me to clearly distinguish where the Nikon, Canon and Sony candidates stand.

From the start, I am resigned that I cannot buy yet a full frame DSLR. On the other end, I don't want to settle for a point and shoot, even if it is the best point and shoot in the world. I feel I need to move on from the compact cameras into the DSLR categories.

From Nikon line, I am considering D300, D200, D60 and D80. D300 is the 2007 Camera of the Year after some rigorous laboratory tests by Popular Photography. This is definitely a nice camera, which has also an extremely nice price of about $2,000 including the stabilized lens (called VR or vibration reduction). As such, D300 is virtually beyond my wallet, but I'll dream for a while. D200, though old still packs a competitive set of very good features. D60 is the newest entry level DSLR from Nikon but I haven't read any significantly positive review about it. This makes me consider D80, another old Nikon, but perhaps the closest to my budget.

From the Canon camp, I am looking at 40D and XSi/450D. 40D comes closest to Nikon's D300 in terms of features and performance based from laboratory tests. It is much cheaper though at $1,499. XSi is more like a close little twin of 40D rather than a big brother of its predecessor, the Rebel XTi. The Rebel XSi (called 450D in Europe and also in Asia, I guess) is the newest release this April. It has live view, IS lens kit (image-stabilized), higher resolution (12 MP, which is even higher than 40D), improved LCD, etc. From its heart and soul though, XSi is still an entry level DSLR and the semi-pro 40D still stands taller overall.

I am eyeing A350 and A700 from the Sony set. A700 has a semi-pro features and it was conceived to battle against Nikon D300 and Canon 40D. Sony falls short this time. In 2006, Sony A100 (Camera of the Year, Popular Photography) was able to momentarily knockdown the camera giants Nikon and Canon when it pioneered the in-camera image stabilization in its class. This time, A700 hardly created a buzz. Nikon and Canon were obviously decisive to flex muscles and show the world who's king when they both fortified heavily the D300 and 40D models and separate themselves from the new challengers (Sony, Pentax, Samsung). Sony A350 is the entry level little brother of A700 but A350 has a more glamorous feature set than A700. Perhaps the only advantages of A700 over A350 are build and speed. A350 has a new flipping LCD which can be useful for overhead and below the waist shot. It has also the best live view so far, even better than any Nikon and Canon. Both Sony A700 and A350 have built-in image stabilization which works with any lens. For a photographer who wants to get specialized wide and telephoto zoom lenses, the additional purchases wouldn't be as prohibitive. Nikon and Canon lenses, though available in more models, can be extremely expensive, even costlier than the camera itself.

I will not go into details here about what I found out about camera engineering and laboratory analysis. For now, this is how I rank the Nikon, Canon and Sony candidates.

Price
First: Sony A350 in a wide margin. Even Sony A700 is still cheaper than Canon 40D.
Second: Canon Rebel XSi, 40D.

The older Nikon models may have dropped in price already but then again, they are old. Both Canon and Sony models above are recent releases. Also, In about 2 years, Canon and Sony entry level DSLRs have slipped by almost half the introductory price. You'll be lucky if Nikon slides the price down of their $1,000-plus models by $300. That's as rare and as long as a solar eclipse.

Image quality
First: Nikon D300
Second: Canon 40D
Either Nikon D200 or D80 can take second place to Canon 40D should I knock off Nikon D300 by my reality wallet.

Speed
First: Nikon
Second: Canon

That is, generally Sony comes third when class-by-class models are compared. There is an inherent shooting and processing speed advantage in the camera engineering of Nikon and Canon. The speed is basically hinged on the CMOS versus CCD argument.

Image Stabilization
First: Sony
Second: Canon or Nikon

I am not sure about the extensive merits of in-camera stabilization (Sony) and lens stabilization (Canon and Nikon) to image quality. What is obvious is that Sony makes DSLR significantly cheaper because of in-camera stabilization. From what I have browsed so far about the physics of light and lens, I think it is wiser to put the image stabilization in the sensor, just as Sony does. I have been getting consistent complaints from camera analysts from various websites against the in-lens stabilization primarily due to the cost factor. The image quality from Nikon and Canon may still be superior but their system's overall excellent performance may be concealing the weakness of lens image stabilization. The lens itself has several moving glasses already and adding image stabilization into it can make it more delicate and complicated. My practical guess is this: both Canon and Nikon are protecting the interests of their bigger, older customer base. Canon and Nikon have several high-end cameras that do not have in-camera image stabilization. To allow their clients to experience image-stabilized shooting by not discarding or replacing their older, expensive cameras, the image-stabilized lens is offered. I suspect though that after some time, Canon and Nikon may shift to in-camera image stabilization and cease to develop image stabilized lens to be able to produce newer, affordable models.

Cost of accessories
First: Sony, definitely
Second: Canon

Just consider the additional lens and Sony blows up the competition. There are other accessories like flash, spare battery, camera bag, tripod or monopod, lights, etc. that an enthusiast may need to buy. In this regard, Nikon and Canon can definitely turn off consumers.

Low-light shooting capability
First: Nikon D300
Second: Canon 40D

This is one aspect of image quality but I am separating this as another criteria because noise is a serious concern. Nikon has made significant strides in this feature already.

Weatherproofing
First: Nikon
Second: Canon

This is one reason why Nikon has a very high resale value. Its build prevents its price from dropping so fast in spite of aging.

This was originally a minor concern for me but the more I read about DSLRs, the more I appreciate its importance. Dust is perhaps the top enemy of DSLRs. Moist and temperature are just secondary problems, I think.

Film cameras can easily replace a damaged film but a dusty sensor in DSLR is like damaging the heart of the equipment itself. To some extent, sensors can be cleaned or sealing can be repaired but generally, experts say better buy a new camera when the anti-dust removal system of your DSLR can't sweep the invading particulates. How serious can that be?

I intend to use the camera in the Philippines where there is significantly more dust than here. So, if I can only afford a camera with an average sealing (body and lens), I wouldn't buy at all. I don't want to turn my savings into dust, so to speak.



Overall, Canon 40D comes out on top based from the criteria above. I would be happy though if Canon comes up soon with 50D which improves the live view, low-light shooting capability and resolution of 40D.

When can this possibly happen? No one can tell for sure but with the DSLR competition heating up, Canon may want to establish its supremacy in such a dominating fashion. Historically, Canon produces newer models in about one and a half year. From this, it implies that we'll have to wait for one year more from now before we can see the successor of 40D (released Aug 2007).

Can I wait for Canon 50D?

I am not really sure given my heightening excitement to shoot with my first DSLR and document my US adventure. On the other hand, I remember canonization takes time. And miracles.

...
040808
#

Tulips and The Shoe ::




...
[Tulips and The Shoe]
:: Ohio State University, Columbus, OH :: 04.18.08 ::